(10-24-2015, 09:44 PM)Ehksidian Wrote: [ -> ] (10-24-2015, 09:31 PM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ]Tapatalk indicates you have a new avatar. I do not recognize anything about it so curiosity compels me to inquire.
Do I want to know the source?
http://www.skindeepcomic.com/
that is if we see the same avatar. dunno if we do or not.
Looks about right. Danke.
Binge time.
So signatures don't try to do space-wasting silly stuff with images, my signature now rotates text-images.
(10-24-2015, 09:55 PM)SilverOtter Wrote: [ -> ]So signatures don't try to do space-wasting silly stuff with images, my signature now rotates text-images.
Really?
Oh, the answer is yes, by the way.
You also owe me five bucks.
(10-24-2015, 09:55 PM)SilverOtter Wrote: [ -> ]So signatures don't try to do space-wasting silly stuff with images, my signature now rotates text-images.
Why would you want ig to constantly change exactly?
(10-24-2015, 10:55 PM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ] (10-24-2015, 10:54 PM)Marxon Wrote: [ -> ]Why would you want ig to constantly change exactly?
Change is nice.
But why be so fancy?
I won't even ever see the signature.
(10-24-2015, 10:56 PM)Marxon Wrote: [ -> ] (10-24-2015, 10:55 PM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ]Change is nice.
But why be so fancy?
I won't even ever see the signature.
Maybe he isn't doing it for you?
(10-24-2015, 10:57 PM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ] (10-24-2015, 10:56 PM)Marxon Wrote: [ -> ]But why be so fancy?
I won't even ever see the signature.
Maybe he isn't doing it for you?
What I'm saying is.
A lot of users use tapatalk, hence why the moment it breaks everyone freaks.
Tapatalk, by default at least, does not show signatures.
(10-24-2015, 10:58 PM)Marxon Wrote: [ -> ] (10-24-2015, 10:57 PM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ]Maybe he isn't doing it for you?
What I'm saying is.
A lot of users use tapatalk, hence why the moment it breaks everyone freaks.
Tapatalk, by default at least, does not show signatures.
Well he's not doing it for us tapatalk users either.
(10-24-2015, 10:59 PM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ] (10-24-2015, 10:58 PM)Marxon Wrote: [ -> ]What I'm saying is.
A lot of users use tapatalk, hence why the moment it breaks everyone freaks.
Tapatalk, by default at least, does not show signatures.
Well he's not doing it for us tapatalk users either.
We're in the majority now last I checked.
(10-24-2015, 10:59 PM)Marxon Wrote: [ -> ] (10-24-2015, 10:59 PM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ]Well he's not doing it for us tapatalk users either.
We're in the majority now last I checked.
Still not doing it for our benefit. He likely does it for his own benefit only.
(10-24-2015, 11:00 PM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ] (10-24-2015, 10:59 PM)Marxon Wrote: [ -> ]We're in the majority now last I checked.
Still not doing it for our benefit. He likely does it for his own benefit only.
Bingo.
You have no idea how much "fend for yourself fuck everyone else" behavior I see in a single work day by the way, people won't move a cart 5 feet to save a life that isn't theirs.
(10-24-2015, 11:03 PM)Marxon Wrote: [ -> ] (10-24-2015, 11:00 PM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ]Still not doing it for our benefit. He likely does it for his own benefit only.
Bingo.
You have no idea how much "fend for yourself fuck everyone else" behavior I see in a single work day by the way, people won't move a cart 5 feet to save a life that isn't theirs.
Personalization doesn't really harm others though.
(10-24-2015, 11:04 PM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ] (10-24-2015, 11:03 PM)Marxon Wrote: [ -> ]Bingo.
You have no idea how much "fend for yourself fuck everyone else" behavior I see in a single work day by the way, people won't move a cart 5 feet to save a life that isn't theirs.
Personalization doesn't really harm others though.
I have a feeling it will get annoying eventually.
(10-24-2015, 11:05 PM)Marxon Wrote: [ -> ] (10-24-2015, 11:04 PM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ]Personalization doesn't really harm others though.
I have a feeling it will get annoying eventually.
Something you can't see will get annoying?
(10-24-2015, 10:56 PM)Marxon Wrote: [ -> ] (10-24-2015, 10:55 PM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ]Change is nice.
But why be so fancy?
I won't even ever see the signature.
the same reason i have my wallpapers on rotate
having a lot of different things, not always at the same time, is nice. it makes things not boring. and just because you won't see it doesn't mean he can't bloody do it, either.
(10-24-2015, 11:05 PM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ] (10-24-2015, 11:05 PM)Marxon Wrote: [ -> ]I have a feeling it will get annoying eventually.
Something you can't see will get annoying?
Annoying for others obviously!
(10-24-2015, 11:11 PM)Ehksidian Wrote: [ -> ] (10-24-2015, 10:56 PM)Marxon Wrote: [ -> ]But why be so fancy?
I won't even ever see the signature.
the same reason i have my wallpapers on rotate
having a lot of different things, not always at the same time, is nice. it makes things not boring. and just because you won't see it doesn't mean he can't bloody do it, either.
Valid point, but signatures on this site are out of control as is, it's why I only access it via tapatalk.
(10-24-2015, 11:15 PM)Marxon Wrote: [ -> ]Valid point, but signatures on this site are out of control as is, it's why I only access it via tapatalk.
what
how are they annoying? no, seriously, how? i rarely even
notice most people's signatures because they tend to be small!
I decided the text-images I had were less than adequate.
Which is why I used screenshot software to harvest quotes from bay12.