It occurs to me that many of these posts would be better suited to twitter than a true forum format, but me not using twitter is a matter of stubborn pride at this point, and I'm all about that.
(02-23-2016, 12:29 AM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ]It occurs to me that many of these posts would be better suited to twitter than a true forum format, but me not using twitter is a matter of stubborn pride at this point, and I'm all about that.
IMO twitter really seems like the least terrible of social media outlets. You can just post things you find interesting or amusing, and people can check your twitter if they want to see it. Simple, to the point, and minimal extraneous crap. I've actually considered getting a twitter account at one point, and social media pisses me off in general.
(02-23-2016, 12:29 AM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ]It occurs to me that many of these posts would be better suited to twitter than a true forum format, but me not using twitter is a matter of stubborn pride at this point, and I'm all about that.
IMO twitter really seems like the least terrible of social media outlets. You can just post things you find interesting or amusing, and people can check your twitter if they want to see it. Simple, to the point, and minimal extraneous crap. I've actually considered getting a twitter account at one point, and social media pisses me off in general.
I mean the format is decent, I just feel like I'd run afoul of the 140 character limit far too often and then there's the whole stubborn pride bit.
Damnit I give up.
I'm convinced that the good Minecraft skin artists are wizards. It's impossible to figure these damn things out.
Over the last two days I've spent a good six hours messing around with this and I just keep hitting roadblocks. How the hell do people use the two layers for such good effect, and how the hell do they mix and match them to create depth? How do they somehow add so much detail with an often limited pallete and in such a limited space?
I've studied many skins and various styles extensively, and I just can't make anything that looks even slightly acceptable, even when using them as a direct reference. ARGHH.
Well it's gonna be an interesting night on /r/furry.
They just banned fetish art wholesale, so somebody posted a pool toy character as "protest."
Comments immediately devolved into a bunch of self-righteous arguments and within 30 minutes the mods took it down.
(02-23-2016, 03:29 AM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ]Well it's gonna be an interesting night on /r/furry.
They just banned fetish art wholesale, so somebody posted a pool toy character as "protest."
Comments immediately devolved into a bunch of self-righteous arguments and within 30 minutes the mods took it down.
maybe they'll ban noah
i hope they ban noah
that would be nice.
Yeah alright NOW I'm being absolutely terrible and egging on all kinds of nonsense now that general Skype chat insanity has devolved into mild-moderate drama.
(02-23-2016, 03:29 AM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ]Well it's gonna be an interesting night on /r/furry.
They just banned fetish art wholesale, so somebody posted a pool toy character as "protest."
Comments immediately devolved into a bunch of self-righteous arguments and within 30 minutes the mods took it down.
maybe they'll ban noah
i hope they ban noah
that would be nice.
The ban on fetish art is temporary while they work on a longer term solution. So I doubt individual bans will happen unless Noah goes an entire week ignoring the new rule.