(03-01-2016, 01:04 AM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ]:REEEEEEE:
Don't knock it til you try it.
I want to squash azurai' smugass murderboning fuck-face
For a second I forgot the context of my own reaction image and was about to say "yes...yes...let the hate flow through you..." but yeah I remember now.
Suffice to say I enjoy a good villain, seeing as how I tend to be a "real life" villain in a lot of contexts.
(03-01-2016, 01:30 AM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ]It's tagged NSFW now though, kinda your own fault for looking at it.
i didn't look at it
i'm just irritated that AS SOON AS IT CAME BACK HE POSTED
and then removed it because it was downvoted to oblivion.
Actually I think RES or reddit does that automatically, once something is downvoted enough it gets automatically hidden.
I don't really give a fuck what he posts or when, fetish art is all he seems to know, and I'm far beyond being capable of giving a shit about being exposed to that, so how other people react to it is their business.
I just realized, because "questionable" content is now automatically NSFW, the people who complained about the temp rules will probably complain about the new full rules later on!
I need to get some popcorn ready.
(03-01-2016, 01:56 AM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ]Actually I think RES or reddit does that automatically, once something is downvoted enough it gets automatically hidden.
I don't really give a fuck what he posts or when, fetish art is all he seems to know, and I'm far beyond being capable of giving a shit about being exposed to that, so how other people react to it is their business.
I just realized, because "questionable" content is now automatically NSFW, the people who complained about the temp rules will probably complain about the new full rules later on!
I need to get some popcorn ready.
nah he straight-up deleted it himself. and if they start complaining and/or protesting by posting their fetish art under the [S] tag, they get the hammer of ban there
(03-01-2016, 01:56 AM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ]I need to get some popcorn ready.
You eat too much popcorn. At least it's not owls.
I literally go through a bag a day. I am horrible with moderation when it comes to snacks, a bag of chips will meet a similar fate, but the popcorn bag is smaller, thus forcing me to stop at some point.
(03-01-2016, 01:56 AM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ]Actually I think RES or reddit does that automatically, once something is downvoted enough it gets automatically hidden.
I don't really give a fuck what he posts or when, fetish art is all he seems to know, and I'm far beyond being capable of giving a shit about being exposed to that, so how other people react to it is their business.
I just realized, because "questionable" content is now automatically NSFW, the people who complained about the temp rules will probably complain about the new full rules later on!
I need to get some popcorn ready.
nah he straight-up deleted it himself. and if they start complaining and/or protesting by posting their fetish art under the [S] tag, they get the hammer of ban there
We'll probably just get more self posts complaining about it.
(03-01-2016, 03:08 AM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ]We'll probably just get more self posts complaining about it.
"wahh my fetish is marked nsfw wahhh"
"Yes it is. your point?"
"it's not nsfw wahhhhhhh"
"it's a fetish get over it"
"IT ISN'T A FETISH WAHHH LATEX-HATING NAZIS"
Ehks you're doing a one-man circlejerk, also known as jacking off your own opinions in front of people. Okay maybe that's a bit harsh, I like a good angry rant from time to time too but it would be best to keep it concise and format it as a rant rather than present it as responses.
The points the deer and husky thingies were making is that their sonas are just like that normally, and they didn't like the notion that their sonas were effectively NSFW by default, so even if they came off as whiny or beating a dead horse they didn't resort to name-calling like noah did and straw-manning them like this doesn't help anyone's position.
(03-01-2016, 03:11 AM)Ehksidian Wrote: [ -> ]"wahh my fetish is marked nsfw wahhh"
"Yes it is. your point?"
"it's not nsfw wahhhhhhh"
"it's a fetish get over it"
"IT ISN'T A FETISH WAHHH LATEX-HATING NAZIS"
Ehks you're doing a one-man circlejerk, also known as jacking off your own opinions in front of people. Okay maybe that's a bit harsh, I like a good angry rant from time to time too but it would be best to keep it concise and format it as a rant rather than present it as responses.
The points the deer and husky thingies were making is that their sonas are just like that normally, and they didn't like the notion that their sonas were effectively NSFW by default, so even if they came off as whiny or beating a dead horse they didn't resort to name-calling like noah did and straw-manning them like this doesn't help anyone's position.
and i was pointing that at noah, because he does call people latex-hating nazis if they don't like his fetish posts. and he acts like it's totally not a fetishy thing at all nope.
(03-01-2016, 03:11 AM)Ehksidian Wrote: [ -> ]"wahh my fetish is marked nsfw wahhh"
"Yes it is. your point?"
"it's not nsfw wahhhhhhh"
"it's a fetish get over it"
"IT ISN'T A FETISH WAHHH LATEX-HATING NAZIS"
-snip-
Ehks you're doing a one-man circlejerk, also known as jacking off your own opinions in front of people. Okay maybe that's a bit harsh, I like a good angry rant from time to time too but it would be best to keep it concise and format it as a rant rather than present it as responses.
The points the deer and husky thingies were making is that their sonas are just like that normally, and they didn't like the notion that their sonas were effectively NSFW by default, so even if they came off as whiny or beating a dead horse they didn't resort to name-calling like noah did and straw-manning them like this doesn't help anyone's position.
To be fair, if they didn't want their OC to be associated with their fetish they shouldn't have made the OC with fetish content.
If I made an OC with ███████ as a central part of their character and for some bizzare reason actually decided to post it somewhere, I would fully understand if some people were weirded out by it and would tag it to avoid people coming across it randomly.
(03-01-2016, 03:17 AM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ]
Ehks you're doing a one-man circlejerk, also known as jacking off your own opinions in front of people. Okay maybe that's a bit harsh, I like a good angry rant from time to time too but it would be best to keep it concise and format it as a rant rather than present it as responses.
The points the deer and husky thingies were making is that their sonas are just like that normally, and they didn't like the notion that their sonas were effectively NSFW by default, so even if they came off as whiny or beating a dead horse they didn't resort to name-calling like noah did and straw-manning them like this doesn't help anyone's position.
and i was pointing that at noah, because he does call people latex-hating nazis if they don't like his fetish posts. and he acts like it's totally not a fetishy thing at all nope.
So pretty much "Even if you can see the body completely nude it's still covered, why is this NSFW?"
(03-01-2016, 03:17 AM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ][snip]
Ehks you're doing a one-man circlejerk, also known as jacking off your own opinions in front of people. Okay maybe that's a bit harsh, I like a good angry rant from time to time too but it would be best to keep it concise and format it as a rant rather than present it as responses.
The points the deer and husky thingies were making is that their sonas are just like that normally, and they didn't like the notion that their sonas were effectively NSFW by default, so even if they came off as whiny or beating a dead horse they didn't resort to name-calling like noah did and straw-manning them like this doesn't help anyone's position.
and i was pointing that at noah, because he does call people latex-hating nazis if they don't like his fetish posts. and he acts like it's totally not a fetishy thing at all nope.
I was referring mostly to the deer and husky thingies, damn their names for I cannot be arsed to recall them, but I suppose technically Noah DID make a self post complaining so the direction you took this kinda checks out.
(03-01-2016, 03:17 AM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ]-snip-
Ehks you're doing a one-man circlejerk, also known as jacking off your own opinions in front of people. Okay maybe that's a bit harsh, I like a good angry rant from time to time too but it would be best to keep it concise and format it as a rant rather than present it as responses.
The points the deer and husky thingies were making is that their sonas are just like that normally, and they didn't like the notion that their sonas were effectively NSFW by default, so even if they came off as whiny or beating a dead horse they didn't resort to name-calling like noah did and straw-manning them like this doesn't help anyone's position.
To be fair, if they didn't want their OC to be associated with their fetish they shouldn't have made the OC with fetish content.
If I made an OC with ███████ as a central part of their character and for some bizzare reason actually decided to post it somewhere, I would fully understand if some people were weirded out by it and would tag it to avoid people coming across it randomly.
I'm not defending them, much as I like being devil's advocate, I was just saying that Ehks is kinda misrepresenting their otherwise sane and civil points as frothing lunacy.