07-06-2015, 05:41 PM
(07-06-2015, 05:39 PM)Ehksidian Wrote:Mark my words it's a slippery and dangerous slope.(07-06-2015, 05:33 PM)Surge Wrote: Then where is the line? Do images have to be bite sized thumbnails to not be "fuckhuge" or do they have to stretch the message they're embedded in excessively before they are banned.
I don't like the idea of "X content, although SFW, is now banned because Y and I say so"
okay
do me a favor, click that link, and tell me the file size of that gif. then, with a straight face, tell me that is perfectly okay to embed because that is a small gif size. You want a hard limit? Okay.
Nothing over 2 MB in size is allowed to be embedded. You happy?
And aside from the giant.gfycat link I didn't find any indication of it being An excessively large gif. On my phone, with shitty reception. It wasn't even an interesting gif either.
http://ask.fm/Surge753
I answer questions. snark provided free of charge.
Most hated member of the nexus, irritation and/or ragequit guaranteed or your money back.
"IF I DO NOT RETURN INFORM MY HUMAN COHABITANTS THAT I FEEL STRONGLY FOR THEM"
I answer questions. snark provided free of charge.
Most hated member of the nexus, irritation and/or ragequit guaranteed or your money back.
"IF I DO NOT RETURN INFORM MY HUMAN COHABITANTS THAT I FEEL STRONGLY FOR THEM"