07-08-2015, 02:40 AM
(07-08-2015, 02:38 AM)Marxon Wrote:(07-08-2015, 02:34 AM)Ehksidian Wrote: Agreed.And please don't overuse your ability to ban, if you want me to go just ask.
I may re-ban marx, but only so he will have more time to adjust to his medication, and so people won't jump down his throat if he says what he said today. He was banned previously for threatening suicide.
He has gotten help. He is adjusting to medication, and needs plenty of time for it to take effect. I unbanned him a bit early, but only because he wanted some interaction. If people will act like this towards him whilst he is adjusting to mood-altering medication - which would logically make him more snappy and unbalanced until his body gets used to it and it begins fully working - I may ban him again.
Not out of need for help.
Not out of breaking a rule
But so he can relax and not have to worry about people getitng mad at him while he's just now starting new medication.
Shh, don't misinterpret that- it'd be instead of a block function for you- since having people shouting at you would just make everything worse-
If reading this just results in people bashing down on you, it would be better if you just kept to yourself to a bit until everything settles in your mind- so, not a "ban" ban, just a placeholder for mental stability
(07-08-2015, 02:40 AM)Surge Wrote: Because the responsibility for an argument falls to whomever "is in the wrong" as opposed to the person who got argumentative.You're both though, in this case. owo