09-01-2015, 12:57 PM
(09-01-2015, 12:49 PM)UnamusedAvali Wrote: Also similar blocked sites problems...I'm not really concerned with the rep issues, I just find a bit indicative of who we're dealing with that when flare commented on how much he was being downvoted it was grounds for sank and ruu to mock him, but when sank comments on how much he's being downvoted we're expected to care?
(09-01-2015, 12:49 PM)Surge Wrote: Just saying I see a lot of "I don't care who started it!" responses from you guys to things. It's a fair enough approach to civil disagreements but personally I think it's a bit light for blatant hypocrisy and personal attacks, mostly because it punishes the target just as much as the attacker.
Course we're all clearly biased one way or another in these things.
Hey, I blatantly stated that I started it.
Just saying.
Well, not blantantly...
(09-01-2015, 12:31 PM)UnamusedAvali Wrote: Right, we can all stop and agree that someone fucked up, almost definitely me, and stop another large scale arguement involving in bans, and possibly to Marx which would well, be very bad to say the least.
This is what I said^
http://ask.fm/Surge753
I answer questions. snark provided free of charge.
Most hated member of the nexus, irritation and/or ragequit guaranteed or your money back.
"IF I DO NOT RETURN INFORM MY HUMAN COHABITANTS THAT I FEEL STRONGLY FOR THEM"
I answer questions. snark provided free of charge.
Most hated member of the nexus, irritation and/or ragequit guaranteed or your money back.
"IF I DO NOT RETURN INFORM MY HUMAN COHABITANTS THAT I FEEL STRONGLY FOR THEM"