09-20-2015, 04:26 AM
(09-20-2015, 04:22 AM)Ehksidian Wrote:(09-20-2015, 04:17 AM)Surge Wrote: ...you know I think we've found schrodinger's ban.
would ehks have taken action against himself if he had no reason to put what he did under any scrutiny? maybe he would have, maybe he wouldn't have, the world will never know.
yes.
unfortunately not even you are qualified to give a definitive answer on that, unless you can predict the future and haven't told us.
We're all human, we may like to do things consistently but perfect consistency is...well...perfect. Perfection is just something we as humans can aspire to like anything else, but we'll never reach it, regardless of talent, skill, practice, whatever you want to call it. We all slip up, we all say or do things we told ourselves we wouldn't.
It's nice to have enough confidence in yourself to say "yes, I would have done that regardless of this variable" but statistically it's not possible for you to be correct on that.
I suppose calling it "schrodinger's ban" is a horrible analogy, though I do find it an interesting thought to consider how my statement impacted the outcome of that situation.
http://ask.fm/Surge753
I answer questions. snark provided free of charge.
Most hated member of the nexus, irritation and/or ragequit guaranteed or your money back.
"IF I DO NOT RETURN INFORM MY HUMAN COHABITANTS THAT I FEEL STRONGLY FOR THEM"
I answer questions. snark provided free of charge.
Most hated member of the nexus, irritation and/or ragequit guaranteed or your money back.
"IF I DO NOT RETURN INFORM MY HUMAN COHABITANTS THAT I FEEL STRONGLY FOR THEM"