10-30-2015, 08:28 AM
(10-30-2015, 08:15 AM)SCN-3_NULL Wrote:Because the human is less predictable, more resourceful, can recover from injuries without a technician and toolkit, can scavenge food in the wild if stranded, and most importantly the human isn't an AI who might start to wonder why he's taking orders at all, never mind from humans.(10-30-2015, 07:58 AM)Reks Wrote: I also have astigmatism.I still refuse to wear glasses though, everything turns tiny and worst after putting it on then off.
So yes, while stuff is a lot sharper up close ...
Said "up close" is three inches.
Past that everything blurs to incomprehensible blobs without glasses
(10-30-2015, 07:46 AM)Surge Wrote: ITT Null ignores the many completely legitimate reasons to use an armored human over a robot.
why waste resources just to protect the squishy innards of a human rather than just put something hard pressed in metal that handles high velocity projectiles better.
http://ask.fm/Surge753
I answer questions. snark provided free of charge.
Most hated member of the nexus, irritation and/or ragequit guaranteed or your money back.
"IF I DO NOT RETURN INFORM MY HUMAN COHABITANTS THAT I FEEL STRONGLY FOR THEM"
I answer questions. snark provided free of charge.
Most hated member of the nexus, irritation and/or ragequit guaranteed or your money back.
"IF I DO NOT RETURN INFORM MY HUMAN COHABITANTS THAT I FEEL STRONGLY FOR THEM"