12-17-2015, 08:16 AM
(12-17-2015, 08:03 AM)Shaadaris Wrote:To be fair it's difficult to just claim to be anonymous or falsely attribute them to something because of the very real threat that they'll remotely load your computer with enough gay porn to revive Freddie Mercury and then kill him again.(12-17-2015, 02:50 AM)Flarezerker Wrote: So what's your guy's opinions on Anonymous?
I like that they seem to care about net neutrality and openness, and they seem to have good intentions in general.
The whole "we are legion and anonymous" schtik is really cool.
However due to their anonymity and purported lack of leadership, I don't see how they get anything done or even how they all decide to and agree on what to do. For all we know, there could be 3 different Anonymouses with completely different agendas and nobody would have any way of knowing which is which. Which is a problem. And is possibly one of the reasons they keep being blamed for a lot of stuff that doesn't seem like their kind of thing. I mean, if everyone is anonymous, anyone can claim to be Anonymous, and anyone who tries to rebuke that claim is also anonymous, even if they actually are Anonymous, but nobody has any idea which is the real one, or even if there is a real one.
Basically, if they really are the good guys they make themselves out to be, then I like them.
If they're the black-hat nutters the media makes them out to be, then I don't like them.
So in essence: I don't have enough coherent information to form an opinion. Which is probably their intention.
http://ask.fm/Surge753
I answer questions. snark provided free of charge.
Most hated member of the nexus, irritation and/or ragequit guaranteed or your money back.
"IF I DO NOT RETURN INFORM MY HUMAN COHABITANTS THAT I FEEL STRONGLY FOR THEM"
I answer questions. snark provided free of charge.
Most hated member of the nexus, irritation and/or ragequit guaranteed or your money back.
"IF I DO NOT RETURN INFORM MY HUMAN COHABITANTS THAT I FEEL STRONGLY FOR THEM"