07-02-2016, 11:26 PM
(07-02-2016, 11:22 PM)Ehksidian Wrote:(07-02-2016, 11:15 PM)Surge Wrote: Would that mean that the optic nerves cannot interpret a sufficiently different image? I don't see why a self-actuated eye is implausible since this level of cybernetics is pretty theoretical to begin with and avali have huge eyes. I would imagine it could be done, it'd be cheaper to use regular cybernetics and probably easier to translate the imagery to the brain but a mobile eye could be done.
there would have to be a lot of mechanical doodly-do in that skull to support that, and that's even if an avali could comprehend being able to move eyes
it'd be like if humans could suddenly move their ears all the way around like a cat or something. would we even be able to tell things are sufficiently different?
Most of those could probably go in the eye itself, miniaturization is a wild wild thing sometimes, but yeah user issues is a good point, sadly I don't think either of us can argue in favor or against as there is no real scientific precedent for the brain adapting to operate a previously absent limb/function.
http://ask.fm/Surge753
I answer questions. snark provided free of charge.
Most hated member of the nexus, irritation and/or ragequit guaranteed or your money back.
"IF I DO NOT RETURN INFORM MY HUMAN COHABITANTS THAT I FEEL STRONGLY FOR THEM"
I answer questions. snark provided free of charge.
Most hated member of the nexus, irritation and/or ragequit guaranteed or your money back.
"IF I DO NOT RETURN INFORM MY HUMAN COHABITANTS THAT I FEEL STRONGLY FOR THEM"