07-06-2016, 01:18 PM
(07-06-2016, 08:42 AM)Shaadaris Wrote:(07-06-2016, 07:25 AM)Reks Wrote: On closer inspection it looks like the art was just cut off at the mid-calf cause the artist said they don't really draw anthro-furry stuffWait, what? There are non-furry artists left?! Egad!
[/joke]
(07-06-2016, 07:39 AM)SilverOtter Wrote: That makes sense. The face is too human-like to be proper anthro, and the rest of the features seem pasted over rather than merged with the body.
...Well now that you point it out that is noticable.
It's weird. I guess it's since I'm by no definition an artist, but I find it odd that a lot of artists have trouble adapting between furry and... uh... humanish? art, no matter which of the two they mostly do. I can understand it being difficult at first, but a lot seem to stay completely focused on one or the other.
Humans are difficult because of the weird contours of the face that I don't have to worry about as much when drawing something anthro
Plus, my mental visualization of humans is far more realistic than my skill level right now, so I don't even try and practice until I have at least anatomical consistancy