08-18-2016, 01:06 AM
(08-18-2016, 12:41 AM)Lost Rinoah Wrote: I'm blunt and I know it. It deals directly with my difficulty in understanding figures of speech as well. If I can skip the entire conversation by simply pointing out the facts, I will do so. Not because I dislike anyone or dislike conversation, but because it's more efficient than letting it go on meaninglessly.That....does actually makes more sense, but HESH shells already kinda do that, in range too, although dont most modern tanks already have spall lining to prevent that? and yeah even IEDs also do way more damage to tanks than other tanks,
So, none taken. In fact it's more of a compliment than anything.
If it's any consolation I've been repeatedly compared to Spock from Star Trek.
SCN-3_NULL Wrote:
Also back to the hammer vs armor topic, I'm not sure was it too crazy to defeat mordern armor, a modernized war hammer should it be kinda single use atleast for the head as it holds an explosive shaped charge? Or even a make shift revolver cannon that holds APFSDS/APDS/HVAP/HEAT ammunition in a short barrel and fired upon impact?
Why not just apply plastic explosives directly in between plates or to the crew cover and set it off at that point? It's cheaper by far, and more effective thanks to very likely killing/KOing the crew without even having to take out the vehicle due to concussive energy transference.
We have things more effective currently already for the specifics of current armor, as it was developed for that purpose.