11-24-2015, 06:37 PM
(11-24-2015, 06:30 PM)SilverOtter Wrote:Now you are telling me that they ARE nothing else than a name for various kinds of small craft?(11-24-2015, 06:12 PM)Jim_Clonk Wrote: They usually have more than their large main weapons. Also, I'm not saying that they don't need/have support in battle.
That isn't really defending but ok.
As if you had to tell me this. Besides, you are the one who based everything on naval ships.
If you really want this kind of realism, cut out the small craft entirely.
Rip that paragraph.
You know what? Fine. No FACs or Corvettes, since you continue to argue in the name of tradition THAT DOESN'T EVEN FUCKING MATTER BECAUSE IT IS A NAME FOR A SHIP THAT CONTINUES TO WORK REGARDLESS OF WHETHER OR NOT IT HAS A FUCKING PEFECT NAME. I JUST WANTED THEM TO ALL HAVE NAVAL CLASSES, IS THAT TOO MUCH TO FUCKING ASK?
Then why aren't we just using the name FAC as a category with fighters/bombers/interceptors being subcategories (which is what I suggested earlier)?
Are they different from the rest or not? Make up your mind!
“i saw this at least i know how to bullet things” - AustinLB90 2015