(07-17-2015, 01:06 AM)SilverOtter Wrote: [ -> ] (07-17-2015, 12:52 AM)AustinLB90 Wrote: [ -> ]just because they're earth dragons doesn't mean they can't fly, and not all dragons that aren't earth can fly.
stop stereotyping dragons.
CHECK UR DRAGON PRIVLEDGE
im 99% sure that, that isn't a thing
(07-17-2015, 01:09 AM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ] (07-17-2015, 01:06 AM)SilverOtter Wrote: [ -> ]CHECK UR DRAGON PRIVLEDGE
...nope, don't have it anymore.
i've read fantasy before, some books had earth dragons that could fly there are no rules against it.
(07-17-2015, 12:23 AM)Shaadaris Wrote: [ -> ] (07-17-2015, 12:13 AM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ]It's fairly common iirc for newly discovered organisms and fossils to be named in some way that ties them back to the scientist who discovered them or, less commonly, to some other import figure. Case in point for that last bit, there is a species of cave beetle named after Hitler.
I believe Coro was referring to how they call it a Dragon, which he hates because its wings are on its arms and not its back...
Now that I think of it, Coro must hate Komodo Dragons.
I do not hate komodo dragons... i just have the same issue.. its mis-naming... though for the komodo dragon the only thing is the saliva feels like your body is burning from the bacteria... so i can see why its called a dragon though its closer to the asian lung if i decided to be accepting of its name.. its the fact that they are sticking dragons and dinosaurs together without realizing the differences are rather important to some... especially to those like me. and no i don't have the fact that the wings are on the arms.. i just rather people pick wyvern as the name over dragon... do i need to mention the human to ape comparison again... oh... right yea i forgot new people here... don't understand why i am so distasteful of the naming conventions.
(07-17-2015, 12:34 AM)Nepeta Wrote: [ -> ] (07-17-2015, 12:26 AM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ]Well as I understand it China rather enjoys their dragon references.
Coro is racist against dragons that are unable to fly confirmed.
WHAT ABOUT THE EARTH DRAGONS
HUH CORO
.... just because a dragon can't fly does not mean its not a dragon... its the body structure that is important with classifications..
-pair of forelegs pair of hind legs a tail and a set of wings is a dragon.
-No wings on the back or arms are wyrms or more commonly lung dragons
-winged arms are wyverns.
(07-17-2015, 01:15 AM)Jim_Clonk Wrote: [ -> ]While I don't know what Coro has against wyverns...
![[Image: AUWxa9b.png]](http://i.imgur.com/AUWxa9b.png)
Yes, this is exactly what we sell here.
Also, somehow I managed to complete all goals up to tycoon at once:
http://i.imgur.com/q1gJ3bO.png
I don't have anything against wyverns... what i have an issue with is humans not using proper naming... is that really something i should be looked down for?!
(07-17-2015, 01:22 AM)AustinLB90 Wrote: [ -> ] (07-17-2015, 01:06 AM)SilverOtter Wrote: [ -> ]CHECK UR DRAGON PRIVLEDGE
im 99% sure that, that isn't a thing
(07-17-2015, 01:09 AM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ]...nope, don't have it anymore.
i've read fantasy before, some books had earth dragons that could fly there are no rules against it.
Human lore on dragons often misrepresent dragons, wyverns and wyrms.... often times focusing on the negatives of the race and acting as though there is no difference between the subraces of the beings... that is my issues with human lores.
(07-17-2015, 01:51 AM)Corosar Wrote: [ -> ] (07-17-2015, 12:23 AM)Shaadaris Wrote: [ -> ]I believe Coro was referring to how they call it a Dragon, which he hates because its wings are on its arms and not its back...
Now that I think of it, Coro must hate Komodo Dragons.
I do not hate komodo dragons... i just have the same issue.. its mis-naming... though for the komodo dragon the only thing is the saliva feels like your body is burning from the bacteria... so i can see why its called a dragon though its closer to the asian lung if i decided to be accepting of its name.. its the fact that they are sticking dragons and dinosaurs together without realizing the differences are rather important to some... especially to those like me. and no i don't have the fact that the wings are on the arms.. i just rather people pick wyvern as the name over dragon... do i need to mention the human to ape comparison again... oh... right yea i forgot new people here... don't understand why i am so distasteful of the naming conventions.
(07-17-2015, 12:34 AM)Nepeta Wrote: [ -> ]Coro is racist against dragons that are unable to fly confirmed.
WHAT ABOUT THE EARTH DRAGONS
HUH CORO
.... just because a dragon can't fly does not mean its not a dragon... its the body structure that is important with classifications..
-pair of forelegs pair of hind legs a tail and a set of wings is a dragon.
-No wings on the back or arms are wyrms or more commonly lung dragons
-winged arms are wyverns.
(07-17-2015, 01:15 AM)Jim_Clonk Wrote: [ -> ]While I don't know what Coro has against wyverns...
Yes, this is exactly what we sell here.
Also, somehow I managed to complete all goals up to tycoon at once:
http://i.imgur.com/q1gJ3bO.png
I don't have anything against wyverns... what i have an issue with is humans not using proper naming... is that really something i should be looked down for?!
(07-17-2015, 01:22 AM)AustinLB90 Wrote: [ -> ]im 99% sure that, that isn't a thing
i've read fantasy before, some books had earth dragons that could fly there are no rules against it.
Human lore on dragons often misrepresent dragons, wyverns and wyrms.... often times focusing on the negatives of the race and acting as though there is no difference between the subraces of the beings... that is my issues with human lores.
Perhaps they get it wrong because dragons never existed in our universe so there is no real right OR wrong way to get it here. A human from another universe could just as easily tell us we got history wrong.
(07-17-2015, 01:51 AM)Corosar Wrote: [ -> ][Walloftextwithmultiquote]
Oh, well, for a moment I was under the impression that you didn't consider a wyvern to be a true dragon. Perhaps a being of lesser value.
(07-17-2015, 02:03 AM)Shaadaris Wrote: [ -> ] (07-17-2015, 02:00 AM)Ehksidian Wrote: [ -> ]oh fuck
You dun goofed.
no i didn't
totally didn't
nope
everything is a-okay and nothing is wrong don['t question me i'll ban you no i'm not panicking o Ao
(07-17-2015, 02:01 AM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ]Messed up quoting... not gonna bother fixing.
But that is the thing.... whither or not they have existed in this "universe" it does not mean that some of us have not been able to know from their experiences and ... quite honestly... its just rather insulting to me that the naming is wrong... and sadly i know how much i stand on my soapbox i sadly will not be able to teach anyone what i know.... as how can an otherkin show what they say is true when none can look into their minds... look into their past... and can't see their memories. *sighs lightly* i hate this life sometimes...
(07-17-2015, 02:03 AM)Jim_Clonk Wrote: [ -> ] (07-17-2015, 01:51 AM)Corosar Wrote: [ -> ][Walloftextwithmultiquote]
Oh, well, for a moment I was under the impression that you didn't consider a wyvern to be a true dragon. Perhaps a being of lesser value.
(07-17-2015, 02:07 AM)Corosar Wrote: [ -> ] (07-17-2015, 02:01 AM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ]Perhaps they get it wrong because dragons never existed in our universe so there is no real right OR wrong way to get it here. A human from another universe could just as easily tell us we got history wrong.
But that is the thing.... whither or not they have existed in this "universe" it does not mean that some of us have not been able to know from their experiences and ... quite honestly... its just rather insulting to me that the naming is wrong... and sadly i know how much i stand on my soapbox i sadly will not be able to teach anyone what i know.... as how can an otherkin show what they say is true when none can look into their minds... look into their past... and can't see their memories. *sighs lightly* i hate this life sometimes...
Yes it does actually, because now we're involving the multiverse and 100 different people can claim to be privy to the "truth" about dragons but get them together and all of their stories will differ in some way. What's true to you isn't true to the next of that 100, and what's true to either of you certainly isn't true to everyone outside of that 100.
(07-17-2015, 02:10 AM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ] (07-17-2015, 02:07 AM)Corosar Wrote: [ -> ]But that is the thing.... whither or not they have existed in this "universe" it does not mean that some of us have not been able to know from their experiences and ... quite honestly... its just rather insulting to me that the naming is wrong... and sadly i know how much i stand on my soapbox i sadly will not be able to teach anyone what i know.... as how can an otherkin show what they say is true when none can look into their minds... look into their past... and can't see their memories. *sighs lightly* i hate this life sometimes...
Yes it does actually, because now we're involving the multiverse and 100 different people can claim to be privy to the "truth" about dragons but get them together and all of their stories will differ in some way. What's true to you isn't true to the next of that 100, and what's true to either of you certainly isn't true to everyone outside of that 100.
you be surprised how many actually out there share the stance i have... otherkin may be rare.. but they are rather alined with the views... but then again.. ignorance is bliss...
(07-17-2015, 02:10 AM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ] (07-17-2015, 02:07 AM)Corosar Wrote: [ -> ]But that is the thing.... whither or not they have existed in this "universe" it does not mean that some of us have not been able to know from their experiences and ... quite honestly... its just rather insulting to me that the naming is wrong... and sadly i know how much i stand on my soapbox i sadly will not be able to teach anyone what i know.... as how can an otherkin show what they say is true when none can look into their minds... look into their past... and can't see their memories. *sighs lightly* i hate this life sometimes...
Yes it does actually, because now we're involving the multiverse and 100 different people can claim to be privy to the "truth" about dragons but get them together and all of their stories will differ in some way. What's true to you isn't true to the next of that 100, and what's true to either of you certainly isn't true to everyone outside of that 100.
We don't even know if the multiverse is even involved...
(07-17-2015, 02:14 AM)Corosar Wrote: [ -> ] (07-17-2015, 02:10 AM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ]Yes it does actually, because now we're involving the multiverse and 100 different people can claim to be privy to the "truth" about dragons but get them together and all of their stories will differ in some way. What's true to you isn't true to the next of that 100, and what's true to either of you certainly isn't true to everyone outside of that 100.
you be surprised how many actually out there share the stance i have... otherkin may be rare.. but they are rather alined with the views... but then again.. ignorance is bliss...
i'm confused, very confused, and I've been confused since you responded to my response to the dragon privlige thing, and i doubt you're gonna try to unconfuse me now.
(07-17-2015, 02:18 AM)Jim_Clonk Wrote: [ -> ] (07-17-2015, 02:10 AM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ]Yes it does actually, because now we're involving the multiverse and 100 different people can claim to be privy to the "truth" about dragons but get them together and all of their stories will differ in some way. What's true to you isn't true to the next of that 100, and what's true to either of you certainly isn't true to everyone outside of that 100.
We don't even know if the multiverse is even involved...
I mean if we're involving two separate realities my understanding of the multiverse is that it's automatically involved.
(07-17-2015, 02:14 AM)Corosar Wrote: [ -> ] (07-17-2015, 02:10 AM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ]Yes it does actually, because now we're involving the multiverse and 100 different people can claim to be privy to the "truth" about dragons but get them together and all of their stories will differ in some way. What's true to you isn't true to the next of that 100, and what's true to either of you certainly isn't true to everyone outside of that 100.
you be surprised how many actually out there share the stance i have... otherkin may be rare.. but they are rather alined with the views... but then again.. ignorance is bliss...
Yes, but I think what Surge was getting at is that if one follows the theory of a multiverse with infinite possibilities, "Dragons" could be any number of things.
In one universe, wyverns and dragons may be part of the same species, in another dragons may be called rabbits and be covered in long locks of hair with twelve legs and an alarmingly spherical body. Just because you say "Dragons are ___" doesn't mean that's true to everyone everywhere always, and you can't get all uppity because people don't call or do call something something else. I can go around calling people "dudebro" or I can name a cat "dog". People will get upset inevitably but that's how things work.
How the hell did this discussion even start again?
(07-17-2015, 02:19 AM)Ehksidian Wrote: [ -> ] (07-17-2015, 02:07 AM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ]Ehks for bestmin 2015
yes i agree i do nothing wrong o Ao oA o
You've ruined everything.
(07-17-2015, 02:19 AM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ] (07-17-2015, 02:18 AM)Jim_Clonk Wrote: [ -> ]We don't even know if the multiverse is even involved...
I mean if we're involving two separate realities my understanding of the multiverse is that it's automatically involved.
That's just the point. Is it actually two separate realities, or not?