(07-19-2015, 09:20 PM)SilverOtter Wrote: [ -> ] (07-19-2015, 09:15 PM)Gonzogonz Wrote: [ -> ]Yes indeed it is. SupCom 2 is a pretty great game too, and personally I prefer it to the original SupCom, but that due to silly things like ground unit AI, the unit design, and the slower build rates. The over all feel of the game is a little different, and on the finer details I prefer SupCom 2.
SupCom 2 is downgraded to the tactical level. It plays out more like -craft style RTSes, at least in the campaign. It's a good game, it's just not SupCom. There would have been less backlash if it had a different IP attached to it.
That and y'know...it's not PA, so it has that going for it
![[Image: FaehoAM.png]](http://i.imgur.com/FaehoAM.png)
These 3 lines mean literally the exact same thing.
(07-19-2015, 09:33 PM)Ippikos Wrote: [ -> ] (07-19-2015, 09:30 PM)Battle Bee Wrote: [ -> ]I love me some SupCom 2, but man was the artillery in that game broken.
>Plays Primarily UEF
>Builds all the Field Artillery
>DAKKADAKKADAKKADAKKADAKKADAKKADAKKADAKKADAKKA
Also, you should see the Mavor in SupCom/FA. Long build time but there's a reason it's classed as a "Game Ender" weapon.
I have played SupCom
a lot.
I know what the Mavor is.
That's not what I meant by "broken". The Mavor was balanced because it was super end-game and took so much time to build.
In the second game, though, artillery was extremely spammable. 4 or so long range artillery would ruin bases, and you could build them in just over a minute.
(07-19-2015, 09:42 PM)Battle Bee Wrote: [ -> ] (07-19-2015, 09:33 PM)Ippikos Wrote: [ -> ]>Plays Primarily UEF
>Builds all the Field Artillery
>DAKKADAKKADAKKADAKKADAKKADAKKADAKKADAKKADAKKA
Also, you should see the Mavor in SupCom/FA. Long build time but there's a reason it's classed as a "Game Ender" weapon.
I have played SupCom a lot.
I know what the Mavor is.
That's not what I meant by "broken". The Mavor was balanced because it was super end-game and took so much time to build.
In the second game, though, artillery was extremely spammable. 4 or so long range artillery would ruin bases, and you could build them in just over a minute.
Hence, DAKKADAKKADAKKADAKKADAKKA. Against the AI, it's kind of the one reason I don't get swamped with hordes of dudes early on. The Quantum Artillery Gun the UEF had though is kinda derpy compared with it's predecessor though.
Also, I tended to use Experimentals more with the other two, especially Aeon. Even if they do have some of the silliest names.
(07-19-2015, 11:46 PM)Nepeta Wrote: [ -> ]....
......
........
OH MY FUCKING GOD
HA
I don't know what the fuck is going on anymore.
(07-20-2015, 01:03 AM)Reks Wrote: [ -> ] (07-19-2015, 11:46 PM)Nepeta Wrote: [ -> ]....
......
........
OH MY FUCKING GOD
HA
I don't know what the fuck is going on anymore.
I think it's at the point where I need a reread.
(07-19-2015, 11:46 PM)Nepeta Wrote: [ -> ]....
......
........
OH MY FUCKING GOD
Dave ruined Nepeta's date? BEST UPDATE EVER
(07-19-2015, 10:02 PM)Jim_Clonk Wrote: [ -> ] (07-19-2015, 09:52 PM)SilverOtter Wrote: [ -> ]God damn that map is small. I've seen the SupCom map it was based on, and it was huge compared to this.
I should probably get the original SupCom.
![[Image: giphy.gif]](http://media.giphy.com/media/Trh2LxGxp0CsM/giphy.gif)
(07-19-2015, 09:42 PM)Battle Bee Wrote: [ -> ] (07-19-2015, 09:33 PM)Ippikos Wrote: [ -> ]>Plays Primarily UEF
>Builds all the Field Artillery
>DAKKADAKKADAKKADAKKADAKKADAKKADAKKADAKKADAKKA
Also, you should see the Mavor in SupCom/FA. Long build time but there's a reason it's classed as a "Game Ender" weapon.
I have played SupCom a lot.
I know what the Mavor is.
That's not what I meant by "broken". The Mavor was balanced because it was super end-game and took so much time to build.
In the second game, though, artillery was extremely spammable. 4 or so long range artillery would ruin bases, and you could build them in just over a minute.
Well in RTS games you ended up being able to anything in seconds. I think the Aeon Nukes were a bit harsh...
A nuke that blows up in your face twice...
Or having 40 soul rippers...
Or few strategic bomber producing Czars
(07-20-2015, 02:59 AM)UnamusedAvali Wrote: [ -> ] (07-19-2015, 10:02 PM)Jim_Clonk Wrote: [ -> ]I should probably get the original SupCom.
You don't even know how much I already hate that meme.
Sorry.
It works so long as it isn't used a billion times for no reason.
So, I decided to play Skyrim again...
I found Crovangar Cave.
I forgot spiders drop on your head from the roof.
I now need a change of trousers.
(07-20-2015, 02:59 AM)UnamusedAvali Wrote: [ -> ] (07-19-2015, 09:42 PM)Battle Bee Wrote: [ -> ]I have played SupCom a lot.
I know what the Mavor is.
That's not what I meant by "broken". The Mavor was balanced because it was super end-game and took so much time to build.
In the second game, though, artillery was extremely spammable. 4 or so long range artillery would ruin bases, and you could build them in just over a minute.
Well in RTS games you ended up being able to anything in seconds. I think the Aeon Nukes were a bit harsh...
Hey, you think Aeon was harsh?
Seraphim fucking experimental. Produces nukes that takes
two ASM just to shoot it down, and produces them at such a ridiculous and cheap rate that you would ruin your economy trying to keep up.
![[Image: 2YX8fEo.png]](https://i.imgur.com/2YX8fEo.png)
![[Image: tumblr_ndkl0iGFBt1rtcfaqo1_400.gif]](http://38.media.tumblr.com/80ea927076a99ba8bfcadf7599314969/tumblr_ndkl0iGFBt1rtcfaqo1_400.gif)
![[Image: 90e69e3c2a3f91f1f6e09b62b5bc10af.gif]](https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/90/e6/9e/90e69e3c2a3f91f1f6e09b62b5bc10af.gif)