Avali Nexus

(07-17-2015, 02:18 AM)Jim_Clonk Wrote: [ -> ]

(07-17-2015, 02:10 AM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ]Yes it does actually, because now we're involving the multiverse and 100 different people can claim to be privy to the "truth" about dragons but get them together and all of their stories will differ in some way. What's true to you isn't true to the next of that 100, and what's true to either of you certainly isn't true to everyone outside of that 100.

We don't even know if the multiverse is even involved...

(07-17-2015, 02:19 AM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ]

(07-17-2015, 02:18 AM)Jim_Clonk Wrote: [ -> ]We don't even know if the multiverse is even involved...

I mean if we're involving two separate realities my understanding of the multiverse is that it's automatically involved.

In my opinion... its not... this "universe" is so large and vast that its most likely then not that dragons as i remember them exist out there or have existed out there.

(07-17-2015, 02:18 AM)AustinLB90 Wrote: [ -> ]

(07-17-2015, 02:14 AM)Corosar Wrote: [ -> ]you be surprised how many actually out there share the stance i have... otherkin may be rare.. but they are rather alined with the views... but then again.. ignorance is bliss...

i'm confused, very confused, and I've been confused since you responded to my response to the dragon privlige thing, and i doubt you're gonna try to unconfuse me now.

Basically i am otherkin... in memory of my last life. I remember exactly the shape, instinct and emotions of my last life that have bled through to this one. Including the views of one. this causes me alot of anguish and emotional issues when i see things that i feel are absolutely against who i was. sorry if this confused you.. its just me being a ranting fuck.

(07-17-2015, 02:27 AM)Jim_Clonk Wrote: [ -> ]

(07-17-2015, 02:19 AM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ]I mean if we're involving two separate realities my understanding of the multiverse is that it's automatically involved.

That's just the point. Is it actually two separate realities, or not?

One has dragons so it can't be ours

(07-17-2015, 02:28 AM)Corosar Wrote: [ -> ]

(07-17-2015, 02:18 AM)AustinLB90 Wrote: [ -> ]i'm confused, very confused, and I've been confused since you responded to my response to the dragon privlige thing, and i doubt you're gonna try to unconfuse me now.

Basically i am otherkin... in memory of my last life. I remember exactly the shape, instinct and emotions of my last life that have bled through to this one. Including the views of one. this causes me alot of anguish and emotional issues when i see things that i feel are absolutely against who i was. sorry if this confused you.. its just me being a ranting fuck.

i looked up the definition of otherkin, but that's not why i'm confused, not sure why i'm confused anymore, so i'll just go back to finishing a terraria portal map,

(07-17-2015, 02:28 AM)Corosar Wrote: [ -> ]In my opinion... its not... this "universe" is so large and vast that its most likely then not that dragons as i remember them exist out there or have existed out there.

I'm sure that was a sentence when you started writing it. But I think I get what you mean.

(07-17-2015, 02:28 AM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ]

(07-17-2015, 02:27 AM)Jim_Clonk Wrote: [ -> ]That's just the point. Is it actually two separate realities, or not?

One has dragons so it can't be ours

Why not?

(07-17-2015, 02:34 AM)Jim_Clonk Wrote: [ -> ]

(07-17-2015, 02:28 AM)Corosar Wrote: [ -> ]In my opinion... its not... this "universe" is so large and vast that its most likely then not that dragons as i remember them exist out there or have existed out there.

I'm sure that was a sentence when you started writing it. But I think I get what you mean.

(07-17-2015, 02:28 AM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ]One has dragons so it can't be ours

Why not?

I suppose they could be aliens. Though complaining that human mythology references an alien species we've most likely never met incorrectly is even more silly.

(07-17-2015, 02:31 AM)AustinLB90 Wrote: [ -> ]

(07-17-2015, 02:28 AM)Corosar Wrote: [ -> ]Basically i am otherkin... in memory of my last life. I remember exactly the shape, instinct and emotions of my last life that have bled through to this one. Including the views of one. this causes me alot of anguish and emotional issues when i see things that i feel are absolutely against who i was. sorry if this confused you.. its just me being a ranting fuck.

i looked up the definition of otherkin, but that's not why i'm confused, not sure why i'm confused anymore, so i'll just go back to finishing a terraria portal map,

it's over i wish these were longer, but i digress, i know dragons aren't always evil, just like an unholy sword doesn't means it has to be used for bad, it's the person or the user who makes it/itself what it is.

(07-17-2015, 02:40 AM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ]

(07-17-2015, 02:34 AM)Jim_Clonk Wrote: [ -> ]I'm sure that was a sentence when you started writing it. But I think I get what you mean.

Why not?

I suppose they could be aliens. Though complaining that human mythology references an alien species we've most likely never met incorrectly is even more silly.

Indeed it is. But it wouldn't really be describing them, it would be describing something very similar that we have made up.

(07-17-2015, 02:43 AM)Jim_Clonk Wrote: [ -> ]

(07-17-2015, 02:40 AM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ]I suppose they could be aliens. Though complaining that human mythology references an alien species we've most likely never met incorrectly is even more silly.

Indeed it is. But it wouldn't really be describing them, it would be describing something very similar that we have made up.

Then once again, it's silly to get upset that we got it wrong when we totally made it up.

(07-17-2015, 02:44 AM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ]

(07-17-2015, 02:43 AM)Jim_Clonk Wrote: [ -> ]Indeed it is. But it wouldn't really be describing them, it would be describing something very similar that we have made up.

Then once again, it's silly to get upset that we got it wrong when we totally made it up.

A point that both you and I have made just a few minutes ago.

"you must construct at least one additional rollercoaster with an excitement rating of 7"
FUCK IT GET THE GIGA!
Okay so this isn't actually a giga coaster, giga coasters are good for giving people whiplash with INFINITE HELIXES, this is the Stormrunner, which is structurally similar to the giga coaster but as I learned trying to build this damn thing it is not even half as compact, no helix sections, no 90* banks, no loops, can't even adjust the bank while changing angle, but it uses boosters instead of a lift hill so I still managed to build this abomination.

Youtube, when I click on "Not Interested", it means I'm not interested in the video, so your stupid little algorithmic head will remove it and similar videos from the "Recommended" section. It does not mean showing it again several times, through several reloads of the page. If I accidentally do not remove whatever shit the Yogscast has put out today, that is not your cue to sneak in another round on the next reload.

Edit: I have solved the problem by wiping my entire watch and search history. I am appalled that Youtube's programmers thought that 2-year-old data on what I watched would be applicable to today, especially if I am no longer subscribed to that channel.

(07-17-2015, 02:44 AM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ]

(07-17-2015, 02:43 AM)Jim_Clonk Wrote: [ -> ]Indeed it is. But it wouldn't really be describing them, it would be describing something very similar that we have made up.

Then once again, it's silly to get upset that we got it wrong when we totally made it up.

In your eyes it seems like something made up... but i don't believe it as so.. but again its an issue with being able to share memories... unable to show them... means they don't exist... this is what i live with.. i guess i should not even bother with people anymore... done trying with explaining my views... go enjoy yourselves all you want..

(07-17-2015, 03:17 AM)SilverOtter Wrote: [ -> ]Youtube, when I click on "Not Interested", it means I'm not interested in the video, so your stupid little algorithmic head will remove it and similar videos from the "Recommended" section. It does not mean showing it again several times, through several reloads of the page. If I accidentally do not remove whatever shit the Yogscast has put out today, that is not your cue to sneak in another round on the next reload.

Edit: I have solved the problem by wiping my entire watch and search history. I am appalled that Youtube's programmers thought that 2-year-old data on what I watched would be applicable to today, especially if I am no longer subscribed to that channel.

Google's algorithms are dumb.
But sometimes they're eerily intelligent.

I was looking for names of toxins one day. After opening up the Wikipedia page for Toxin, I type in "list of" and Google automatically ends it with "toxins"
I've never googled this before.

The robo revolution is upon us.

(07-17-2015, 03:54 AM)Battle Bee Wrote: [ -> ]

(07-17-2015, 03:17 AM)SilverOtter Wrote: [ -> ]Youtube, when I click on "Not Interested", it means I'm not interested in the video, so your stupid little algorithmic head will remove it and similar videos from the "Recommended" section. It does not mean showing it again several times, through several reloads of the page. If I accidentally do not remove whatever shit the Yogscast has put out today, that is not your cue to sneak in another round on the next reload.

Edit: I have solved the problem by wiping my entire watch and search history. I am appalled that Youtube's programmers thought that 2-year-old data on what I watched would be applicable to today, especially if I am no longer subscribed to that channel.

Google's algorithms are dumb.
But sometimes they're eerily intelligent.

I was looking for names of toxins one day. After opening up the Wikipedia page for Toxin, I type in "list of" and Google automatically ends it with "toxins"
I've never googled this before.

The robo revolution is upon us.

viva la revolution!

(07-17-2015, 04:20 AM)SCN-3_NULL Wrote: [ -> ]

(07-17-2015, 03:54 AM)Battle Bee Wrote: [ -> ]Google's algorithms are dumb.
But sometimes they're eerily intelligent.

I was looking for names of toxins one day. After opening up the Wikipedia page for Toxin, I type in "list of" and Google automatically ends it with "toxins"
I've never googled this before.

The robo revolution is upon us.

viva la revolution!

I knew you were behind it all.



I accept Alpha as my new lord and savior.

(07-17-2015, 03:53 AM)Corosar Wrote: [ -> ]

(07-17-2015, 02:44 AM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ]Then once again, it's silly to get upset that we got it wrong when we totally made it up.

In your eyes it seems like something made up... but i don't believe it as so.. but again its an issue with being able to share memories... unable to show them... means they don't exist... this is what i live with.. i guess i should not even bother with people anymore... done trying with explaining my views... go enjoy yourselves all you want..

Are you implying that people who have been dragons(, or other creatures), could have told tales of their previous lives and have contributed to this mythology that way? Seems plausible enough, I guess.

You keeps saying that you can not share memories. While that may be true in a direct way, you can share stories, and with that you can share memories.

So want Elite: Dangerous...
Wish I had the money.

My habit of building questionable coasters continues, now with scenery and no tunnels.

In other news I got distracted for 5 minutes and my park somehow has been coated in a thick layer of vomit and litter, the janitors have been sweeping nonstop for 4 months now and have only just now started to put a dent in the mess.

(07-17-2015, 05:23 AM)Surge Wrote: [ -> ]
My habit of building questionable coasters continues, now with scenery and no tunnels.

In other news I got distracted for 5 minutes and my park somehow has been coated in a thick layer of vomit and litter, the janitors have been sweeping nonstop for 4 months now and have only just now started to put a dent in the mess.

4 fucking months?
Dude, quarantine the whole region. Napalm bomb it.